Artificial intelligence is reshaping how we live and how we make collective decisions. As Luciano Floridi — philosopher and Professor of Philosophy and Ethics of Information at the University of Oxford — argues, the key challenge is no longer whether AI will continue to develop, which is largely unavoidable, but how to steer it towards the public good.
This ethical question also arises in parliamentary settings, when parliamentary administrations introduce AI systems to support internal work. Alongside the promise of greater efficiency lies a core issue: the effect these technologies may have on the democratic functions of elected assemblies.
If AI begins to influence, or potentially displace, aspects of the traditional law-making process, the central question becomes whether responsibility for the final vote on a law — or any parliamentary act — remains firmly with elected representatives or shifts, even indirectly, towards AI systems. Against this backdrop of opportunities and risks, this article maps the main AI tools being developed in parliaments and reflects on how Italy’s Chamber of Deputies and Senate are responding.
A fragmented global landscape
To understand Italy’s approach to this issue, it is useful to look beyond the national context. So far, the adoption of AI in parliaments has been concentrated mainly in highly developed countries and has not been accompanied by a shared regulatory framework. The result is a fragmented landscape in which technological development and regulation are largely shaped by individual parliaments or EU institutions.
In practice, each parliament is adopting one or more AI tools according to internal priorities, with potentially significant implications for institutional organisation and the conduct of democratic deliberation.
Some applications are designed for internal use, supporting parliamentary staff, MPs and legislative committees. Others are outward-facing, aiming to enhance transparency, accessibility and citizen participation.
Some tools affect the legislative process directly; others primarily reshape the relationship between parliament and citizens. Current examples range from AI-assisted transcription and automated classification of debates and parliamentary activities, to automated sequencing of votes on amendments, drafting support and admissibility checks, natural-language search of parliamentary documents, and tools intended to synthesise public sentiment around bills under discussion. These examples suggest that AI is not merely a neutral administrative upgrade. It can reshape parliamentary power and practice, particularly when adoption concentrates on a specific class of tools.
Strategic choices in AI adoption
International cases illustrate how AI deployment may reflect strategic choices about parliament’s institutional role.
The Chilean Congress, for example, through its Caminar platform, has prioritised simplifying legislative activity by supporting the drafting of bills and amendments. By contrast, Brazil’s experience with initiatives such as Brasil Participativo has focused on strengthening popular participation, developing participatory AI solutions.
It is therefore unsurprising that the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), which represents parliaments worldwide, has recently stressed that before adopting AI tools, parliaments should clarify the institutional role they intend to play in the future, particularly in relation to deliberation and the balance between parliament and government.
The IPU outlines three possible trajectories for representative assemblies:
- AI-Augmented Assembly: AI enhances human judgement while democratic primacy is preserved; AI acts as a “co-pilot” rather than replacing human decision-making.
- Data-Driven Legislature: AI becomes central to decision-making, with political deliberation increasingly displaced by predominantly evidence-based processes.
- Shadow Legislature: AI capabilities are concentrated within the executive branch, leaving parliaments structurally disadvantaged in managing emergencies, analysing complex dossiers and engaging citizens.
In light of the IPU’s 2025 global review of parliamentary AI applications, each parliament can assess whether its trajectory aligns with one of these models. Italy cannot be described as a “Shadowed Legislature”, as the Parliament has developed one of the highest numbers of AI tools to date. The more open question is whether Italy is moving towards an “AI-Augmented Assembly” or a “Data-Driven Legislature”.
At its current stage, Italy appears closer to the Augmented Assembly model. The internal governance framework, together with existing and planned applications, is designed to support — rather than replace — MPs’ work and decision-making. The intention is to strengthen parliamentary functions through more efficient administrative processes while preserving political responsibility.
Here is a list of articles selected by our Editorial Board that have gained significant interest from the public:
Italy’s emerging model
According to the guidelines adopted internally, current and future parliamentary AI applications in Italy should not operate as autonomous deliberative tools, capable of replacing human decision-making. They are required to provide answers based solely on internal sources, and their outputs must be reviewed by parliamentary officials and/or politicians. Under these rules, AI is expected to improve efficiency in a controlled and accountable manner, while final decisions remain with elected representatives and parliamentary bodies.
One example is the AI tool “Computation of amendment similarity scores”, developed to facilitate comparison among amendments by estimating the degree of similarity between proposed texts. The system streamlines the work of the offices operating under the Speakers’ jurisdiction that compile and organise amendments, without constraining the prerogatives of the House Speaker.
The Speaker retains full authority to determine the final voting order in line with political considerations, established practice and parliamentary rules. As with other applications, the tool is intended to support parliamentary activity rather than substitute it.
Featured ESG Tool of the Week:
Klimado – Navigating climate complexity just got easier. Klimado offers a user-friendly platform for tracking local and global environmental shifts, making it an essential tool for climate-aware individuals and organizations.
Future risks and institutional choices
The long-term trajectory of the Italian Parliament will depend on future institutional choices. These include decisions on whether AI applications will continue to be financed through parliament’s internal budget, as well as the level of investment in training and recruitment within parliamentary administrations.
Further technological developments may require stronger mechanisms to monitor and audit AI outputs, reinforcing the need for systematic capacity-building among staff in both the Chamber and the Senate.
A second issue concerns the implications of outward-facing AI tools for the digital divide. Will these systems reduce inequalities by making access to parliamentary information and participation easier, or will they widen gaps by increasing barriers for citizens who are less digitally confident?
For now, Italy stands among the frontrunners in the development of parliamentary AI tools. If managed carefully, its approach could offer a model for other countries seeking to integrate AI into democratic institutions without weakening representative accountability.
This article was originally published under Creative Commons by 360info™.
Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by the authors are their own, not those of impakter.com — In the Cover Photo: The Italian parliament in joint session for the inauguration of President Sergio Mattarella, Feb. 3, 2022. Cover Photo Credit: Palazzo del Quirinale
Today’s ESG Updates
- FedEx Launches Reusable Packaging: New reusable packaging for B2B shipping can last 50 cycles, cut costs 30%, and reduce emissions up to 88%.
- EV Adoption in Australia: Replacing 1 million petrol cars with EVs could cut foreign fuel use by over 1 billion litres annually.
- Trafigura & Minerven Gold Deal: The partnership launches a responsible gold-sourcing programme to ensure compliance and curb illegal mining.
- Tesla & LG $4.3B Battery Deal: Tesla and LG will build a Michigan facility to produce LFP batteries for Megapack 3 systems starting in 2027.
FedEx launches reusable packaging for sustainable B2B logistics
FedEx launched a reusable packaging system for B2B shipping to reduce waste and carbon emissions. The system was developed in partnership with Returnity, which specialises in reusable packaging systems for logistics, retail, and e-commerce supply chains. It’s designed for closed-loop environments, and well-suited for in-house fulfillment centers, store restocking, or field service support, where returns and reuse are controlled and predictable.
The lifespan of each reusable packaging is up to 50 shipping cycles, and each cycle can reduce costs by up to 30% compared to single-use packaging. Moreover, there is a 64%-88% emissions reduction compared to single-use corrugated packaging.
The system is currently available in the U.S., with plans to expand to Australia and Europe.
- **
Further reading: FedEx Launches Reusable Packaging for B2B Shippers
Featured ESG Tool of the Week:
Klimado – Navigating climate complexity just got easier. Klimado offers a user-friendly platform for tracking local and global environmental shifts, making it an essential tool for climate-aware individuals and organizations.
EV adoption in Australia could reduce reliance on foreign fuel by billions of litres
EVs could reduce Australia’s reliance on foreign fuel by more than 1 billion litres annually. Photo Credit: CHUTTERSNAP
Switching from petrol cars to electric vehicles (EVs) could greatly reduce Australia’s dependence on foreign fuel and lower emissions. Experts say EV adoption shifts energy consumption from imported petrol to domestically produced electricity, making Australia less exposed to global oil price shocks.
Australia could reduce its reliance on foreign fuel by more than 1 billion litres a year if 1 million petrol cars are replaced with EVs. Currently, only about 2% of Australia’s 20 million vehicles are EVs. Annual fuel consumption by petrol and diesel cars in Australia is about 25 billion litres, so replacing half of all vehicles with EVs could cut consumption by around 12 billion litres.
- **Further reading: Replacing 1m petrol cars with EVs could cut Australia’s reliance on foreign fuel by 1bn litres a year
Here is a list of articles selected by our Editorial Board that have gained significant interest from the public:
Trafigura and Venezuela’s Minerven launch responsible gold‑sourcing programme
Trafigura and Minerven partner to develop a responsible gold‑sourcing programme. Photo Credit:
Trafigura will partner with Venezuela’s state-owned miner Minerven to develop a responsible gold-sourcing programme. The programme is part of a pre-payment deal in which Trafigura will buy and sell gold dore produced exclusively by Minerven, with the supply ranging from 650 kg to 1 metric ton. The initiative aims to ensure compliance with labor and regulatory standards and avoid gold linked to illegal or criminal mining activities, particularly in areas like the Orinoco Mining Arc. The programme is intended to improve the credibility and international acceptance of Venezuela’s gold industry.
According to official data, Venezuela’s gold production rose 37% to 9.5 tons in 2025. Venezuela’s central bank had 47 tons of gold in its official reserves as of the end of 2025.
Further reading: Trafigura to help Venezuela’s Minerven develop a responsible gold-sourcing programme
Tesla and LG Energy Solution sign $4.3 billion U.S. battery deal
Tesla and LG Energy Solution will build a $4.3 billion battery cell manufacturing facility in Lansing. Photo Credit: Prometheus 🔥
The U.S. government has officially confirmed that Tesla and LG Energy Solution have signed a battery supply agreement to build a $4.3 billion battery cell manufacturing facility in the United States. The facility will produce lithium iron phosphate (LFP) prismatic battery cells in Lansing, Michigan, boosting domestic battery supply chains. The batteries are intended to power Tesla’s Megapack 3 energy storage systems in Houston. The deal was part of a broader statement on deals highlighted by the Trump administration at the Indo-Pacific Energy Security Summit.
The production at the new battery facility is scheduled to begin in 2027.
- **
Further reading: US government confirms Tesla and LG Energy Solution’s $4.3 billion battery deal
Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by the authors are their own, not those of impakter.com — Cover Photo Credit: Nick Morales